PlatON价格

OKCoin Europe Ltd

54930069NLWEIGLHXU42

platon

PlatON utilizes a Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism enhanced by a Concurrent Byzantine Fault Tolerance (CBFT) protocol. This approach is designed to improve consensus efficiency within partially synchronous networks. CBFT incorporates features such as pipeline validation, batch production, and low-complexity view changes, drawing from best practices in existing protocols like PBFT, Tendermint, and Hotstuff. By implementing these techniques, PlatON achieves a more efficient and robust consensus process.

In PlatON's economic model, validators are incentivized to maintain the distributed ledger through a combination of transaction fees and block rewards. These rewards are designed to compensate for the costs and risks associated with network maintenance. Additionally, PlatON's staking mechanism allows LAT holders to delegate their tokens to validators, indirectly participating in network security and earning rewards. Transaction fees are paid in LAT token.

2024-09-24

2025-09-24

118260.00000 (kWh/a)

For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts.